<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bits and pieces of thoughts and personal achievements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenWFEru on JRuby! Getting there &#8230; by on the JRuby front &#171; processi</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/openwferu-on-jruby-getting-there/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>on the JRuby front &#171; processi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/openwferu-on-jruby-getting-there/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] See Nicolas&#8217; post for the full details. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See Nicolas&#8217; post for the full details. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faster ruby(2) by hellonico</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>hellonico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Charles, 

I&#039;ve updated with my results with your options. It does really speed things up. 
Since I am trying to get an application to work seamlessly whether on ruby or jruby, I am going to try those options on our own test suite as well.
Will keep you posted !

Thanks a ton for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve updated with my results with your options. It does really speed things up.<br />
Since I am trying to get an application to work seamlessly whether on ruby or jruby, I am going to try those options on our own test suite as well.<br />
Will keep you posted !</p>
<p>Thanks a ton for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faster ruby(2) by Charles Oliver Nutter</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Oliver Nutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>FYI, there&#039;s a few things you can do to speed this test up in JRuby:

* Pass -J-server to JRuby to use the Java &quot;server&quot; VM

* wrap the 0.upto pieces in methods and pass -J-Djruby.jit.threshold=0 to get them to compile (the whole script won&#039;t compile because the compiler doesn&#039;t compile class defs yet)

* Pass -O to JRuby to turn off ObjectSpace

With those changes made the two tests came in at around 9 seconds and 7 seconds, with MRI around 7.5 seconds on my sytsem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, there&#8217;s a few things you can do to speed this test up in JRuby:</p>
<p>* Pass -J-server to JRuby to use the Java &#8220;server&#8221; VM</p>
<p>* wrap the 0.upto pieces in methods and pass -J-Djruby.jit.threshold=0 to get them to compile (the whole script won&#8217;t compile because the compiler doesn&#8217;t compile class defs yet)</p>
<p>* Pass -O to JRuby to turn off ObjectSpace</p>
<p>With those changes made the two tests came in at around 9 seconds and 7 seconds, with MRI around 7.5 seconds on my sytsem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faster ruby by hellonico</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>hellonico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Charles,

Thank you for your comments and insight. 

I went back and ran the experiment again:
http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2

I wonder what makes those two tests behaving differently from a jruby point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments and insight. </p>
<p>I went back and ran the experiment again:<br />
<a href="http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2" rel="nofollow">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2</a></p>
<p>I wonder what makes those two tests behaving differently from a jruby point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faster ruby by Charles Oliver Nutter</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Oliver Nutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The second example is somewhat surprising to me. In the first case, if Niko is a constant in the current module/class namespace, it will do a single lookup to find it, followed by a single lookup in the Niko namespace to find MY_CONST. In the second example, it will first search the current module or class for MY_CONST and then search the included module for MY_CONST. Both cases work out to two constant hash lookups, so it&#039;s strange that one would be faster in Ruby than the other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second example is somewhat surprising to me. In the first case, if Niko is a constant in the current module/class namespace, it will do a single lookup to find it, followed by a single lookup in the Niko namespace to find MY_CONST. In the second example, it will first search the current module or class for MY_CONST and then search the included module for MY_CONST. Both cases work out to two constant hash lookups, so it&#8217;s strange that one would be faster in Ruby than the other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tracing calls in ruby by John Mettraux</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/19/tracing-calls-in-ruby/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mettraux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/19/tracing-calls-in-ruby/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Nice ! Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice ! Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
