<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faster ruby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hellonico</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>hellonico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Charles,

Thank you for your comments and insight. 

I went back and ran the experiment again:
http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2

I wonder what makes those two tests behaving differently from a jruby point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments and insight. </p>
<p>I went back and ran the experiment again:<br />
<a href="http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2" rel="nofollow">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby2</a></p>
<p>I wonder what makes those two tests behaving differently from a jruby point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Oliver Nutter</title>
		<link>http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Oliver Nutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellohellonico.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faster-ruby/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The second example is somewhat surprising to me. In the first case, if Niko is a constant in the current module/class namespace, it will do a single lookup to find it, followed by a single lookup in the Niko namespace to find MY_CONST. In the second example, it will first search the current module or class for MY_CONST and then search the included module for MY_CONST. Both cases work out to two constant hash lookups, so it&#039;s strange that one would be faster in Ruby than the other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second example is somewhat surprising to me. In the first case, if Niko is a constant in the current module/class namespace, it will do a single lookup to find it, followed by a single lookup in the Niko namespace to find MY_CONST. In the second example, it will first search the current module or class for MY_CONST and then search the included module for MY_CONST. Both cases work out to two constant hash lookups, so it&#8217;s strange that one would be faster in Ruby than the other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
